One reply on “1.6 Strange Particles $($1947~1960$)$”
Sorry but this part of notes might be full of mistakes, I will amend them later when I am confident in may understanding… But basically it won’t be far from the correct version since it’s just a brief note of Griffiths’s content.
–from the contributor
One reply on “1.6 Strange Particles $($1947~1960$)$”
Sorry but this part of notes might be full of mistakes, I will amend them later when I am confident in may understanding… But basically it won’t be far from the correct version since it’s just a brief note of Griffiths’s content.
–from the contributor